#Freedom debt relief lawsuit 2019 pro
#Freedom debt relief lawsuit 2019 free

Wyoming's senators called the agency's action 'heavy-handed bureaucracy.' The case was settled in 2016, with EPA dropping the fines and demands, and Johnson agreeing to plant willow trees to protect the ground from erosion. EPA found that he had violated the Clean Water Act, demanded that he remove the pond, and fined him $37,500 per day, eventually resulting in $16 million in fines. Johnson built a stock pond on his property in Wyoming to provide water for his cattle. PLF represented Andy Johnson in a dispute with the Environmental Protection Agency. Fish and Wildlife Service failed to delist the species after it concluded that the bald eagle population had recovered. Scarlett, a case that resulted in the removal of the bald eagle from the endangered species list. PLF attorneys represented a Minnesota property owner who was denied the right to build on his property in Contoski v. PLF's environmental law litigation has frequently involved challenges to federal regulation of private property under the Clean Water Act or the Endangered Species Act, including five victories at the U.S. PLF won a case at the Michigan Supreme Court, challenging a common practice of counties foreclosing properties for unpaid taxes and keeping the surplus home equity. PLF successfully challenged San Francisco's 'Relocation Assistance Payment Ordinance', which required landlords to pay tenants to regain personal use of their property. PLF has litigated housing and zoning issues in lower courts. Johns River Water Management District, and Knick v.

Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Palazzolo v. The Foundation's attorneys have successfully argued five takings cases at the United States Supreme Court: Nollan v. PLF's property rights cases have focused on regulatory takings and environmental regulations. Ĭurrently, PLF has a staff of over 100 employees and three offices across the United States: Sacramento, CA Arlington, VA and Palm Beach Gardens, FL. PLF won its first Supreme Court case in 1987 and has since argued 18 cases, with three more scheduled in 2023.

#Freedom debt relief lawsuit 2019 free

In describing the reasons for starting PLF, Raymond Momboisse, one of the founders, asserted that PLF represented 'the free enterprise system and the little guy.' PLF was one of the first in a movement of freedom-based public interest law firms (PILF) in the early 1970s. Operating on a proposed budget of $117,000 for the first 10 months of operation, PLF attorneys began litigation activities in June 1973 under the direction of Ronald A. Incorporated in Sacramento, California, on March 5, 1973, PLF's original staff was composed mainly of individuals who had been a part of then-Governor Ronald Reagan's welfare reform team. Īs of 2022, PLF has litigated 18 cases before the United States Supreme Court, won 16, and lost 2. The foundation is generally described as supporting libertarian or conservative causes. Except for court-awarded attorney fees for case victories, the organization receives no government funding. Pacific Legal is primarily funded by donations from individuals, foundations, associations, small businesses and corporations. The organization is the first and oldest libertarian public interest law firm, having been founded in 1973.

#Freedom debt relief lawsuit 2019 pro

PLF attorneys provide pro bono legal representation, file amicus curiae briefs, and hold administrative proceedings with the stated goal of supporting property rights, equality before the law, freedom of speech and association, economic liberty, and the separation of powers. The Pacific Legal Foundation ( PLF) is an American nonprofit public interest legal organization established for the purpose of defending and promoting individual and economic freedom.